Comparing Adidas Running Shoe Finder to Nike Running Shoe Finder proved to be an insightful journey. The Adidas experience was notably seamless, featuring a user-friendly interface that simplified the entire process. Even for those with difficulty recalling specific shoe names, navigating the options was effortless. In stark contrast, Nike’s Running Shoe Finder presented a somewhat overwhelming array of choices, highlighting Adidas’ success in creating a more straightforward and user-friendly platform.
The Adidas Running Shoe Finder’s end user flow was tailored to perfection, employing well-crafted closed-ended questions to discern customers’ specific requirements. This approach resonated with my needs as a frequent runner, clocking in over 5 runs a week, often covering distances exceeding 10 kilometers. My emphasis on cushioning, seeking a shoe that delivered both security and stability with each step, aligned seamlessly with the Adidas Adistar, a recommended match for my progress-oriented goals as a male runner.
Conversely, the Nike Running Shoe Finder adopted a more diverse approach, categorizing shoes by feel and goals. The options spanned from cushioned and supportive to responsive and neutral, fast and light, and rugged and durable. However, navigating through the 6 to 25 options within each category left me more bewildered than enlightened. The scenario became particularly perplexing when seeking a shoe that offered both cushioning and responsiveness. Even under the umbrella of broader goals like “get into running,” the multitude of 43 options presented by Nike added an extra layer of confusion. While Nike boasts a diverse range, it can be overwhelming, especially for new runners attempting to navigate the intricacies of the selection process.
CONSCIOUS RUNNING 